Stoke Newington CAAC March 2021

Planning Applications for Stoke Newington CAAC meeting for 8 March 2021

2020/4140 157 Stoke Newington Church Street, N16 0UH Installation of an extractor flue on the rear elevation and the construction of a single storey rear (conservatory) extension. Full Planning Permission (Claire Moore)

The Stoke Newington CAAC have no objection to the proposals.

2021/0215 Flat 1, 94 Lordship Park, N16 5UA Erection of single storey timber clad outbuilding to rear garden Full Planning Permission (Micheal Garvey)

The Stoke Newington CAAC have no objection to the proposals.

2021/0225 61 Leswin Road, N16 7NX Replacement of shipping container with a cold store refrigeration unit to external yard Full Planning Permission (Micheal Garvey)

The Stoke Newington CAAC have no objection to the proposals.

2020/4129 The Finsbury, Finsbury Park Hotel, 336 Green Lanes, N4 1BY Erection of ground, first and second floor extensions to the rear and a new third floor to enhance the existing public house facilities and to provide nine residential dwellings with associated refuse and cycle provision. Full Planning Permission (Erin Glancy)

The Stoke Newington CAAC have no objection to the proposals.

2021/0581 3 Brownswood Road, N4 2HP Retrospective single-storey rear extension Full Planning Permission (Erin Glancy)

The Stoke Newington CAAC have no objection to the proposals.

2021/0590 20 Finsbury Park Road, N4 2JZ Installation of lawn and permeable Indian Sandstone paving in front garden in place of existing slate chippings. Replacement of existing overgrown hedge with English Yew hedging (to be planted in existing flower bed). Full Planning Permission (Kim Aukett)

The Stoke Newington CAAC have no objection to the proposals.

2020/3495 14 Wilberforce Road, N4 2SW Construction of a hip to gable roof conversion, a rear dormer and insertion of 2no. front roof lights associated with a loft conversion. Full Planning Permission (Claire Moore)

The Stoke Newington CAAC objects to the proposals. The hip to gable is contrary to policy and would harm the appearance of the Conservation Area and disturb the established rhythm of the roof form the CA was created to protect for further erosion. In addition the quality of resultant amenity is poor and the cumulative effect of this and previous consents constitute overdevelopment of the host property.