Stoke Newington CAAC October 2016

Planning Applications for Stoke Newington CAAC Monday 10 October 2016

 

Flat A, 94 Hawksley Road, N16 (Single-storey rear infill extension) – 2016/3043 (James Carleton)

We have no objection to the proposals.

60-62, Stoke Newington Church St, N16 (New shopfront and internally-illuminated fascia sign) – 2016/2225 & 2244 (Louise Smith)

We object to the proposals for the following reasons:-

 

  • The loss of the divisions in the fascia shown in the previously approved proposals.
  • The inappropriate scale of the lettering.
  • The lettering should not be internally illuminated

 


Flat B, 36 Gloucester Drive, N4 (2-storey rear extension) – 2016/3202 (James Carleton)

We no longer make comments on applications affecting this part of the CA.

Land at Wilmer Place, N16 (2, 3 & 4-storey building in previous car park) – 2016/3179 (Nick Bovaird)

We object to the proposals for the following reasons:-

  • The detailing of the elevation facing the Cemetery is over articulated and gives the feeling of being too “busy”.
  • We are happy with the two-thirds commercial use, but there should be more space between the development and the Cemetery.


42-46, Queen Elizabeths Walk, N16 (Rear dormer roof extensions etc.) – 2016/3269 (Louise Smith)
We object to the proposals for the following reasons:-

 

  • The proposals would lead to overdevelopment of the site.=
  • The proposed combined rear dormer would be an overlarge element in the domestic scale of the area.

 


The Three Crowns 175 Stoke Newington Church Street, N16 (Temporary scaffolding shroud) – 2016/3435 (Catherine Slade)

We object to the proposal for the following reasons:-

  • Advertisements are not appropriate in the Conservation Area.

Please note that we were not consulted on this application

285, Stoke Newington Church Street, N16 (Rear dormer roof extension) - 2016/3670 (Tim Wild)

We have no objections to the proposals.

17, Grazebrook Road, N16 (Single-storey rear/side extension etc.) – 2016/3567 (Tim Wild)

We have no objections to the proposals.

Please note that this application was incorrectly listed as not being in the Conservation Area.

This page was added on 14/10/2016.

If you're already a registered user of this site, please login using the form on the left-hand side of this page.